#supreme jokes

[theshitpostcalligrapher]

the danger of putting thank goodness you're here playthroughs while you work is that I am now DEEPLY craving a nice meat pie

sigh

guess I'm hauling my ass across town for pie

[chronic-shinposter]

i plan to refine this but it's kind of funnier in sketch form

[savageserpent]

I can excuse service top Jayce but I draw the line at dom Jayce In a relationship? that's just unnatural

[chalamet-chalamet]

This is one of my favorite looks from him ✨✨✨

[me-beef]

Give u a banan

thank u for the banan it inspired me to make a comic based on a conversation me and my wife had a couple years ago

[feralportalmaster]

Joel says he’s gonna look for a Blue Axolotl in Hermitcraft.

Theory: because him and Lizzie are connected through every server they’ve ever been in, Joel’s looking for the one entity that links directly back to her.

He’s not just looking for a Blue Axolotl, he’s looking for Lizzie 😭

[mugiwara-lucy]

Well guys if you aren’t aware,

Russell Vought has been brought in to be in Shitbreak’s administration and for those unaware, he’s the chief writer behind Project 2025 who has been on video not only saying he wants Americans living in trauma and fear but he wants to use the military on American civilians when they inevitably get fed up with things, I.e, why Pete Hegseth aka Drunky Brewster was selected.

Which is ironic considering Trump wanted to shoot BLM protestors back in 2020 if you all remember.

Now the main reason behind this post is I want to remind veterans that either see this post or follow me; remember your oath is NOT to the president but to the constitution that founded America.

Considering Trump is a draft dodger who made a spectacle out of Arlington and called Veterans “suckers and losers”, is this the guy you want to potentially commit illegal actions for? And what are illegal actions?

These include: using the military to go after political enemies, invading allied countries such as Canada and Mexico and Columbia and Greenland and Panama and shooting at protestors.

Do you really want to shoot protestors who are as young as being in college or even in high school for protesting an obviously corrupt government? Like look at the people Trump has appointed. They are LAUGHINGLY unfit for their jobs. Not to mention do you really want to commit heinous acts for a cabinet that wants to cut your benefits? Yeah as a quick reminder, Project 2025 cuts VA benefits. (Which is ironic considering these bastards want to use the military for a police state hell yet clearly don’t give two shits about them).

So with all that said and done, you all have two choices.

1.) You can go with your sense of morality and help us fight back against these assholes and you will be remembered on the right side of history.

2.) You can be the police force for these corrupted wannabe Nazis and be hated and reviled like the soldiers in Russia and North Korea. Those soldiers are not looked at fondly in those places I mentioned but rather with fear, hatred and disgust.

Even though I believe you all will side with the constitution (or rather there will be enough that will against all the looneys), I just want to remind you all:

DO WHAT’S RIGHT.

[couldntbedamned]

The Sharon Carter Fans greet you, Dr. Strange Fans.

[lab-gr0wn-lambs]

Why do people sleep on how dope the first season of Steven Universe is? And the people who say you just have to sit through it to get to the good stuff?? what?? The first season is literally the best one. It's the funniest, the animation is infinitely more fluid and expressive with creative color palettes and environments, it was genuinely unnerving and scary, and everthing was just cooler? Like a lot? So much more magic and whimsy and intrigue and impact. The sick asf monster designs and gem locations. The jokes. The kindergarten episode. the Lapis episodes. Cat fingers and Frybo. Garnet cracking right down the middle in the scariest possible way. Remember when Garnet was scary btw? And the subtly deep emotional beats that aren't just people bursting into tears and yelling like- Honest to god if you like steven universe but not the first season I don't trust your opinion on any media ever.

[foggycakefart]

MY IPAD I DO ART ON BROKE SO I CANT DO DIGITAL ART, but whatever, danganronpa

idk what to draw anymore so like 😔😔😔

speech bubble translation cuz my handwriting kinda sucks:

kokichi: what if i hate queers like you

shuich (thought bubble)i: do i look like a lesbian?

[eggbagelz]

They invented a subculture for me it's called loserpunk

[stephen-barry]

Can someone explain why TikTok is a bigger national security concern than a social media platform run by a South African technofeudal oligarch actively interfering in our elections and sabotaging our national interests here and abroad?

[randomnameless]

The quintessential problem with Claude and the deer is that they should not have been involved in the war at all, or at least not Claude. What does he have to gain participating on it? Nothing, and he makes it even more explicit in azure moon when he dissolves the alliance. He could've pretty easely given the power to Lorenz or Hilda and nope out of there (what he does in silver snow), as it is clear througouht white clouds that he doesn't have as much of an attachtment to Fodlan as he does Almyra. And it isn't like the devs couldn't take the deer studients out during post-TS, when Marianne unless recruited is pressumed dead, and Lorenz unless recruited joins the imperial forces and dies helping the empire.

Outside of the problems with racism and the bigoted tropes related to "savage cultures" the Fodlan games perpetuate, the devs did not know how to use one of their house leaders for the main plot of "church vs empire", and idk if that's because they bit more than they could chew, or if it was intentional taking into account who gets the short end of the stick in both games happens to be mixed and from one of those "savage cultures".

TBH...

It's on the devs for having wanted to add a third lord to their game, but failing to, well, link him to any of those plots.

Supreme Leader's war of unification?

Well, Nopes gave him a part this plot - and yet there's no third choice in this plot : you bend the knee or you die. Nopes' wise, Clout decided (in his route) to bend the knee with his "alliance" that is totally supposed to make Supreme Leader reconsider her desire to roll over Leicester and make it part of Adrestia again!

(Granted, Nopes don't tell us how his plea to stop the war after killing the evil lizard lady will play out and leaves an open ending...)

In Houses, well, he doesn't want Leicester to be flattened, and goes on the offensive (counter offensive?) when Billy pops up with basically what is the plot events of Silver Snow (down to using the same strategy with disguises) with the Gronder Map.

And that addition radically changes... well, everything regarding Claude's relevance : he cannot form an alliance with the Blue Lord or the Kingdom to get rid of the Empire because "plot convenient myopia" and apparently Dimitri BaD enough that he attacks Alliance troops for no reason.

Forget SS, GW (and AM, in a way) is just using plot contrived excuse to... not have an united from to face the Empire. Why? IDK. Each Lord must be the hero of his story, or the unification boner means only one of them can "win" an unified Fodlan i'd guess.

Nabateans and the plot ?

No one gives a fig about that "plot", so it's basically pursuing a side-quest for no payoff.

Now, as @fantasyinvader wrote, Claude's story and journey as one who is ignorant and gets to learn and clear his misconceptions + the background of the land we're living in could have been interesting, doubly so given how Billy is voiceless and cannot play the "protag discovers the world at the same time as the player does" role.

But it has... no payoff.

Much like Rhea's infodump about the World, Relics and Nabateans... Claude reacts to the mention that Billy has a rock for heart, and not about his crest, his shiny bow or the fact that Rhea also had a vested interest in, uh, getting rid of prejudice against people who are perceived as "different" because her family was genocided for that.

Hell, the entire "prejudice" angle from Supreme Leader's war is swept under the rug, so we can have the Deers say nonsense like wanting to rekt Thales for Supreme Leader's sake, while only Flayn and Seteth can hear her "nabateans shouldn't have power over the people"...

There's no parallel drawn in the game about Claude and Rhea's situation - since she's at the center of this subplot - about being perceived as "outsiders" and not being able to do various things from existing to "rule over the people" because of what they are, or even faking their identities and building metaphorical walls between them and the people they're living with because they are afraid of rejection.

Nah, we can't have that, Rhea must be irrelevant to the possible, while also being the biggest scapegoat/dragon of this saga at the same time as a nebulous red herring to sell pots of tea.

Ihthe "fight against prejudice and make people accept each other" angle was that relevant to his route, Claude would have most likely talked or interacted with Dimitri and learnt of his plan to cleanse Duscur's name in his Father's assassination, raised a brow at Petra being a hostage and done something else than give a surprised pikachu face at Rhea's infodumps.

He could have reacted at her reveal that if you might want to live in peace with some people, if those people don't want that and label you as nothing more than fodder or things to be looted, it's not going to work.

And of course, gave a reaction at your second in command (unofficially?)'s reveal that, uh, her house keeps identured Almyran children as war prisoners?

Some people already made some AUs or "what ifs" routes for a proper Claude route and not the nonsense that we got in FE16 where it's basically "I react to the same plot events that happen in the other routes but top it all with a zombie".

The Deers could have been "better introduced" in a plot about getting rid of prejudice, or learning the causes of this prejudice : Marianne was/is hunted because of her blood ties to Maurice - not because what she did, but because what Momo did back then! - Lysithea was treated as a guinea pig and her house rolled over by Adrestia who has a less than rosy views about the "offshoots" that are called Leicester and Faerghus, Lorenz could explain that prejudice, just like piety, are tools used by people whenever they're relevant, like, some people being pissed at foreigners and some who aren't because they make money through international trading like Margrave Edmund does, Hilda justifying her House's animosity towards Almyrans because they lost many people in those pointless skirmishes (maybe a closed ones? Her mom or Uncle or whatever?) which would make Claude realise that "ending prejudice" is a much more difficult quest than, idk, just killing one or two randoms.

The commoner trio might share Claude's views about prejudice and welcoming foreigners, but have more "mundane" worries like being able to have a roof and food to eat, which might be the case of some people in Leicester, or tell us more about Leicester and how it works (give us more insight about the different countries if Fodlan ffs).

Maybe we could have add a Claude who learns and discovers Fodlan, and along the way, starts to love the land as much, if not more, than Almyra and really wanting to protect this land from whatever Supreme Leader's cooking, or becoming an Almyra v.2.

I don't think making Claude the third wheel of the plot was maliciously intentional because of the, uh, implications with RL cultures and Almyra, but more like they didn't know where to put him.

I noticed you wrote the conflict as one that is "the church vs the empire", but I do not really agree - if that was the case, the war would have stopped in VW/AM/SS the second Rhea was caught.

The main conflict is Supreme Leader's war of conquest - with the twist that the devs were really banking on their brilliant idea of making the red emperor the titular waifu of the game that each person/lord/whatever Rhea is must find a way to excuse and/or justify her actions.

With this in mind, AM is basically Dimitri's fall (and rise!) because of his ties to Supreme Leader.

In VW? The game cannot explore too much outside of the Supreme Leader scope so we're left with.. well, what VW was.

Claude cannot go on a journey to discover Fodlan and get rid of his misconceptions... because part of those same misconceptions are used by Supreme Leader to start her war, or the sheer concept of a conquest, aka a nation being rolled over by another is anathema to his, supposed, ideal of wanting people to accept each other despite their differences.

I ranted about it since day 5, but the Nabatean subplot (and Fodlan in general) is accessory to Supreme Leader war, there is no point aka no payoff for learning all of that, because you cannot challenge the one who wants to unify the continent.

As such, Claude cannot deviate too far from this plot - while receiving infodumps about "the lore" - and we end up with third wheel of a bike and characters who, at first and second glance, appear to be irrelevant.

Fodlan ends up unified despite starting as three separate countries, we feel bad for Supreme Leader and mourn her unknown ideals, Rhea is gone and the Agarthans aren't a problem anymore.

the second the devs said leicester was a republic, claude was doomed. Merchant republics are always irrelevent or straight up useless in the FE series!

[pawbeanies]

yeah everyone SAYS they want a gamer boyfriend but the moment i say "chat is this real" after seeing my partner naked for the first time suddenly this isn't a safe space??

[morphogenetic]

yknow. i know I've said before in tags that I don't care about US voters abstaining from the presidential vote as long as they vote for their state/local elections

...after reading that supreme court decision I don't think that any more. if youre a US voter vote for the fucking president please christ I do not want another term of trump because if he wins it might be the last election we ever have

[charmac]

What leads you to believe rcg intended for Mac to be gay by s4-ish? It seems like everything they say , at least publicly, contradicts that it wasn’t a choice made that early on.

(I assume this is in response to this ask, though correct me if I'm wrong)

In Season 4, Mac's Banging the Waitress, it's stated Mac is only doing what he's doing to get back at Charlie, he isn't really interested in sleeping with the Waitress in any way, in fact he's kind of annoyed that he has to and wants to just limit it to "hand stuff" (which he later claims he wasn't even into). At the very end of the episode, Charlie and Dennis both agree that they view Mac's "tough guy" act and his Project Badass videos as an attempt to impress them because he wants to fuck them.

Obviously this is played as a joke, it's funny that everything Mac does in an attempt to be a badass just comes off gay... but is he actually gay? They didn't make a choice here to tell the audience something about Mac, no, it's (mostly) just a joke.

Once we hit Season 5, they play much harder into this "joke," with every other Mac and Dennis scene being some innuendo or homoerotic scene. By the time we hit Mac and Dennis Break Up, there's no denying that they're playing this "bromance" break up as if it's a real break up. Again, it's arguable that there's nothing here genuinely intended to imply the characters are gay, but that it's funny how gay they come across for each other in their codependency. What's the implication of their dynamic?

Well, the DVD Commentary for MADBU has Charlie quite literally say, "They're gay, they're clearly gay...There's no arguing that they're closeted homosexuals," and whether Charlie is expanding on the joke for the shits and giggles or not is really almost irrelevant. The fact of the matter is that they did write it and act it to come off gay (even just for a joke), and when they sat down and watched it, it came off super gay and they acknowledged it.

So when I say Mac being gay in S4-6 was intentional, I'm not so much saying RCG's intention was to make Mac an actual gay character at that point, but that the heavy handed gay jokes were intentional— and that's what gave them a very easy foundation to build on top of (Mac is in love with Dennis) once they actively decided to make Mac a gay character (S8, very clearly).

Even if the original intention was jokes and not real, true characterisation, it was always intended to be gay ~in some way~